Tag Archives: Thoughts

A Committee of Our Peers

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Why does anyone think that a “Super Committee” of 12 members of Congress, six each from both parties, is going to solve anything?

By “anything,” I’m including what to order for lunch.

Well, some ideas are just too big to keep to myself – like I ever needed a really big idea as an excuse to write. Do you know what I think? (I certainly hope not.) What I think is that the “Super Committee” should consist of 12 Americans selected more or less at random, like a jury.

I’m not kidding. 12 Americans selected at random, subject only to the following constraints, in no particular order: (1) They must be American citizens. (2) They must be registered voters – four of them Democrats, four Republicans and four Independents. (3) They must be at least 18 years old.

MOST IMPORTANTLY, (4) They cannot have ever run for office, or currently be running for office, or be employed by any office holder or candidate, by any political party, action committee, lobby, whatever. We’re all political. I get and like that about us. I just want to make sure there are no actual politicians or political activists on the committee.

There. My money tells me these 12 we pick will figure out what to do, and that it will be a well rounded solution that makes good, common sense. (Congress can then ignore their suggestions and get back to doing what it does best, whatever that is.)

Six months from now, when I’ve proved my point, the next thing I’m going to suggest is that, every two, maybe four years, we use the same criteria to select 535 people at random to be our House and Senate. …You can’t seriously think they won’t do better than the current bunch of yahoos we we’ve elected.

-wf

The Multiplier Effect

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Why do the President and Congress always talk about programs in terms of 10 year periods? Sometimes it’s because the changes they’re trying to accomplish are so huge, so momentous they’ll actually take 10 years to accomplish. Mostly, it’s because they want to exaggerate the beneficial impact of some new program or law while spreading out the negative effects on their corporate contributors and electorate supporters. They are, in other words, cheating. Spinning like a top.

Those of you who studied economics when you were in college are probably familiar with “the multiplier effect.” It’s the way buying one thing creates demand for other things that go into making the first thing, and so on. It may take only one stubble-faced guy, wiping his hands on an apron that had to have been dirty when he bought it, to slice that shwarma and make the gyro you’ve been thinking about all morning, but think how many other people were involved in making that giant lump of who knows what meat, the pita bread, the paper plates and 34 napkins you’ll need to eat it and the chewable antacids you’ll be popping later that afternoon – and the ingredients that went into making those things too.
Continue…

The Wedgy

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Why do the airlines allow all the passengers on a given flight to carry on luggage, winter coats if it’s that time of the year, and other stuff, regardless of the overhead space available to hold those items?

Oh, wait. When you read the title, you probably thought I was talking about the well-known “playground wedgy,” aka the “locker room” or “hallway wedgy,” whereby someone picking on you grabs the elastic of your underwear in the back and pulls it up so your underpants get stuck in… in your you know what. ..So I’ve heard, but claim not to know from personal experience. That’s my story. Anyway, this “Wuf?” is about an entirely different class of wedgy, the “airplane wedgies” of which there are at least two kinds.

(I’m curious. When I was in high school, girls didn’t wear pants. Wedgies were strictly a guys thing. Now that times have changed, is there anything like a girl wedgy?)
Continue…

Cigarettes

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Why, if cigarettes are so toxic, so bad for you – which they are – and so addictive, aren’t they illegal?

The FDA has just announced new images, scary, revolting images intended to further discourage people from smoking. The Surgeon General warnings were apparently insufficiently severe to get the job done. What a surprise. Does our FDA not understand the concept of addiction? Apparently not. Either that, or it’s not really serious about putting an end to smoking. If the FDA was serious, it would have halted the manufacture and sale of cigarettes a long time ago.

When it comes to tobacco, to what model of public health management does the FDA subscribe? Instead of protecting us from the hazard, they way they would by not approving or pulling a deadly medicine, they chose instead to issue warnings, and leave it up to us to stop consuming. Can you imagine them announcing that, I don’t know, a popular cough syrup for children is deadly, followed by a casual, “Good luck with that.”

I wonder what the costs have been to our society and to the individual families most directly affected by smoking-related illnesses, compared to, let’s say, heroine and other hard drugs which are illegal.

So why, given all we know about the dangers of smoking, can you still buy cigarettes at your local grocery store and gas station? Certainly there is nothing of a moral nature stopping the manufacturers from making and selling their product. I mean, ask yourself what kind of company, what person sells something he or she knows is killing its customers? Wow. It’s as unbelievable as it is disgusting. Would you do that? For any amount of money? Or is money what it’s all about, and we’re just quibbling over the price? Careful, that last question was the criterion that George Bernard Shaw once used to define being a whore.

The fact is, it is all about the money. About the money that’s made growing and selling tobacco and the political contributions and lobbyists all that money supports. Okay, so money talks, and the producers and facilitators – from farmers to Phillip Morris, to the advertising agencies and media, to our elected officials – are all a bunch of you know whats. The question is, what does that make us for letting it happen?

-wf

US (“Useless”) Airways, Part 2

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Why would anyone fly US, aka “Useless” Airways if it weren’t absolutely the only way to get from A to B? This is the unexpected sequel to “Wuf?” #7: US Airways.

You know, I said a lot of harsh things about US Airways in a previous “Wuf?” series posting, and now I feel bad. I feel bad because I obviously left some stuff out of my last rant.

Earlier this morning, I flew from A to B on US Airways. Two out of three of the trays in my row were broken. (Let’s hope they take better care of the engines.) The lady sitting by the window used hers even though her stuff kept sliding from right to left in front of her. I couldn’t use mine because the left bracket was so broken it let that side of the tray hit my knee, so I just left it up.

And so I wondered, “Was there a ‘working tray fee’ I forgot to pay?” I reported the tray to one of the Flight Attendants on the way out the door – reflecting as I did on how close “Flight Attendant” sounds like “Lavatory Attendant.” I thought reporting the tray was the right thing to do, and that maybe I’ll get a credit, a tiny credit because I had to hold my cup of Coke in my lap for an hour. Come to think of it, US Airways management probably knew my tray was broken which is why they didn’t offer me anything to eat, or even a napkin to prevent my cup of Coke from sweating a ring on my khakis. How thoughtful.

Anyway, this tray experience got me thinking about what other new fees US Airways might concoct. Maybe a “seatbelt/no seatbelt fee”? (Overweight people who need “an extension” would pay double.) Maybe a “polite/not polite fee” or “smile/no smile fee”? (Have you noticed that some of the Flight Attendants on US Airways don’t look any happier to be on the plane than their passengers – and the Flight Attendants are getting paid. And then the ultimate “crash/no crash fee” which, I’m guessing, should be a huge moneymaker.

US Airways: “Because at 37,000 feet, no one, no matter how bad we treat them, is going to get up and leave.”

-wf

US Airways

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Why would anyone fly US Airways if it weren’t the only way to get from A to B?

Maybe it’s their unattractive logo, a stupendously poor representation of an American flag? Or maybe it’s the way they nickel and dime you – more like $25 per bag, $100 to change your reservations, only $50 if you’ll fly standby? But then they have every right to make money, and many of the other airlines charge similar fees.

I know, it must be the clumsiness of their website. How endearing. No, no. It’s the captive advertising, the ads on the surface of every tray and the live USAirways credit card commercials so adroitly delivered by their flight attendants. ..Hm. Hard to choose, isn’t it?

How ‘bout the way they charge you $25 to ask a live customer service – Now there’s a misnomer if there ever was one. – a live customer service rep to help you reserve a flight over the phone? Could it be the thoughtful manner in which they extort “Choice Seat” fees from people who can afford to select their seats early, on-line, rather than gambling on where they might be stuck if they wait until they get to the airport to pick out a free one? (Apparently, the price of ticket in coach includes a seat, in coach, but not any seat.)

Wait, I’ve got it. It’s all of the above. It’s the arrogance with which they treat their customers, the flying public. It’s the, “Hey, do you want to fly or not?!” attitude that comes from knowing they have substantial control if not a virtual monopoly over many of the markets they serve. It’s the “We couldn’t give a crap,” “Screw you buddy” corporate culture that allows an airline to keep the routes it serves year in and year old without regard to value or customer satisfaction.

What’s not to love? Can you find US Airways in the list of airlines shown in this recently published industry survey?

-wf

Seedless Watermelon

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Why do farmers and grocery stores get away with calling seedless watermelon “seedless”? Where is truth in advertising? Shouldn’t the FDA being doing something?

I’ve eaten more than my fair share of watermelon and believe myself to be fully qualified to determine the presence (or absence) of seeds. In any case, it’s not like you need a doctorate in agriculture or melonology, whatever, to realize that so called “seedless” watermelons are anything but. Well, technically, they do have less, as in fewer, seeds, but that’s not what “seed-less” implies, is it? “Seedless” means zero seeds.

At best, seedless watermelons have none of the larger, I think more mature, more intelligent black seeds – the one’s you spit out into your yard or at the beach. (“What? You don’t spit out your watermelon seeds? …Let me guess, Mr. Trump, you eat your pizza with a knife and a fork?”) Maybe they should be called “Seeded Watermelon Light.” Maybe not.

The problem is, the smaller white seeds are harder to get out of the watermelon than the big black ones, making seedless watermelons more tedious to eat than the regular kind. Even worse, maybe it’s just my imagination, but I don’t think seedless watermelons, which tend to be smaller, taste as good as their adult counterparts.

Seeded or seedless watermelons? It’s just one more decision we can do without making. Life is too short – and real watermelon way to good on a hot day – to settle for any less than the real thing.

-wf

Parsley

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Why does anyone still use parsley to garnish food? And then there’s the larger question of why anyone would garnish food – put something (barely) edible on a plate just to make it look better by some outdated standard or custom. The food itself should be attractive, and should need decorating. What a waste, unless my suspicions are true and seedier diners and other restaurants wash off and re-use their sprigs of parsley from plate to plate, customer to customer.

Traveling on business, I got up early to run out for breakfast at the local “Bob Evans,” Down on the farmmm.” I was the first customer and was waited upon immediately by a pleasant woman who took my usual order: Fake eggs (Egg Beaters or some other brand of yellow colored egg whites), hash browns, wheat toast, lightly buttered and a small orange juice. And I opened my copy of the USA Today that I picked up in the hotel’s lobby.

Seconds later – I’m not kidding, it was the fasted food ever, like getting gas at a NASCAR pit stop. – my breakfast was in front of me. As you can see, there were the eggs, the hash browns and a strangely hard and flavorless slice of tomato. I knew this about the tomato because I had had the same breakfast the day before. I didn’t want the tomato, but that at least it was a vegetable people regularly eat. And then there’s the ubiquitous sprig of parsley artfully laid on top of the tomato. In light of the recent news about an outbreak of potentially deadly food-born disease in Germany, I thought for a moment I heard the little sprig singing to me to the tune of those annoying Swiss lozenge commercials… “E-co-liiiii.”

I was in hurry. With no one to talk to over breakfast, I wolfed down my food and was done barely 10 minutes later. “Yum.” (I’m kidding. Eating on the road isn’t nearly as glamorous as many people think. You’ve got tons to do, and way too little time to do it. Eating when you’re traveling on business, particularly in small towns and on a reasonably limited budget, is more about survival than gastronomical delight.)

You saw my plate before I ate. Now take a look at the after-shot. Notice anything? (The parsley! I’m talking about the parsley.) It’s still there. No surprise. Let’s take a survey. Would everybody who’s ever actually eaten his or her sprig of parsley raise his or her hand?

“Yes? …You there in the blue bowling shirt and Buddy Holly glasses. Where is that, Kansas? …You’re the only person with your hand up and waving it like you have a question?”

“I do,” he said, pushing his glasses up to bridge of this nose. “What does parsley taste like?”

“Excellent question. Most people don’t know. Suffice it to say that it’s bitter and otherwise unpleasant. No one but Food TV cooking show hosts actually uses in their food except, in an emergency, to “complement” (or kill) the taste of some other flavor.”

And yet, there it is. Parsley. Personally, I rather they use dandelions. They’re free and conveniently located in places such as my neighbor’s lawn. They have all those nice yellow petals that would match my eggs, brighten my day and I could smear them on things like I used to do when I was a kid. …I’m not sure, but aren’t they edible too? Is dandelion wine a real thing, or just a figment of some folk singer’s imagination?

-wf

Cargo Pants

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Why doesn’t everyone where cargo pants? Let’s start by listing the pros…

They’re substantially more comfortable than the business “slacks” that so many men wear to their white collar jobs. Yes, that’s right. I said “slacks,” not “pants” to make the point that, whatever your age or lack of it, wearing khakis or their dressier equivalent is old school, and not in a good way. For all intents and purposes, you’re wearing your father pants.

They’re more durable. Pants that last longer cost you less.

They’re easier to manufacture because the pockets are on the outside. And the pockets last longer because they’re made of more durable, exterior grade material.

Most importantly, they hold more. Not just more of the usual stuff, wallets, cell phones, little packages of Kleenex, but other things – like sandwiches and Baby Ruths that wouldn’t fit or would be squished in regular pants pockets.

They not only hold more stuff, it’s easier to get that stuff out without having to squirm or unhook your seatbelt and risk the wrath of an overzealous flight attendant. (“Sir,” she said sternly, “would you puh-lease keep your seatbelt fastened.” There’s no question mark because she wasn’t asking. This is the same flight attendant who, only moments ago, bending over to help the gentlemen seated across the aisle from me, thrust her tush into my face so suddenly and extensively (“Yikes!”) that I instinctively recoiled into the space of the woman sitting in the middle seat to my right – who thought I was, who know what. Trust me, this tush-thrusting was not the pleasant sexually suggestive experience some of you may be thinking. Are you kidding? Lesser reflexes and I could have been seriously hurt.)

They come in a variety of styles with as few or as many pockets as your sensibilities can tolerate. If you like, you can start simple and work your way up gradually, depending upon your coworkers’ reactions.

And now the cons…

It’s hard to escape the notion that you’ve just returned from a safari and haven’t had time to change before coming going to the office.

Cargo pants are unequivocally casual.

That’s it. I mean, that’s it? Yes. Those are the only drawbacks.

Now com’on, admit it. I’ve made a very, very persuasive case. You’d really prefer to wear cargo pants to your next presentation or Board meeting, you just aren’t man enough, not confident enough to make a fashion statement, even one this practical. You fancy yourself to be a trendsetter, but you’re not. How pathetic.

My advice is that you grow a pair and take those cargo pants you keep in your closet to wear on weekends, slip them on, one leg at a time, and fill up all those pockets. Go ahead. I dare you. Now go to the office, and let me know how your day goes, and about the promotion you thought you were going to get. I want good news… so I can get up the nerve to wear mine to work.

-wf

“Is everything okay?”

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Why do restaurants – upscale, moderate and low end, it doesn’t make any difference – insist on having their wait staff interrupt your meals, your conversations, your most personal and professional moments to ask, “Is everything okay?” (“Well, it was until you asked.”)

“Honey?” she says seductively, reaching between her class of wine and the votive candle, across the soft linen tablecloth to touch the back of my hand. “…Why don’t we skip..”

“So how are you folks doing?”

Get my point. Or maybe, “And so, Mr. Goldman, do we have a deal?” I ask after my pitch perfect over dinner closing presentation. Mr. Goldman straightens up, his head actually bobbing vertically, unable to suppress the hint of a smile, “I think,” he begins to tell me in a seriously deep voice, “I can speak for Mr. Sachs when I say, ‘Congrat…”

“And was the Salmon everything I promised? …More wine?”

Where was that guy when my last girlfriend was in the process of dumping the living crap out of me?

For one thing, I’m way too nice a guy to tell the waiter the truth, that the fish was too salty, the vegetables overdone and the wine too bitter. (If I were more sure of myself, I’d have ordered a sweet rosé instead of one those dark, overpriced wines real men pretend to like.) No, I’m way too nice. “Everything’s fine, thank you,” I tell him. “Now please go away before your obnoxiousness blows any chance I have of getting lucky tonight.” ..Yeah, I wish. (“And I was this close,” I think to myself, desperately wondering how I can reclaim the moment.)

I was on the road last week where I had breakfast at a Bob Evans, “Down on the farm.” I was there 20 minutes, during which the waitress asked me no fewer than 3 times how I was doing, and the manager came over once to inquire for herself. Did I have a particularly severe scowl on my face? Was I grumbling something awful while I wolfed down my fake eggs (Egg Beaters) and hash browns? No. I was reading through the morning stories at MSNBC.com on my cell phone. I think I need to smile more while I’m chewing my food.

-wf