Tag Archives: News

The New Politics of “I blame me.”

Friday, November 25, 2011

I have an expression. It’s my expression. I made it up. I’m going to tell you the expression. You can think about it, but if you use it, you owe me a royalty.

“Screw you, buddy!” ..Hey! I heard that! I was just kidding about the royalty – unless you were actually considering paying me one, in which case I was serious. No? I didn’t think so. Anyway, I was kidding about the royalty, but thank you for helping me make my point. My point is that everybody nowadays, people, governments, everybody is way too uptight, too sensitive.

I’ll give you only one example, but there are zillions, many of which, unfortunately, have major and too often negative implications for the quality of our lives, here in America and around the world. This particular example is a fluff piece, but then I don’t want to be accused of being too serious while I’m in process of complaining about just that.
Continue…

The Simple, Obvious, But Nonetheless Powerful Way To Get People Back To Work

Friday, September 16, 2011

What usually happens when we have downturns is that our President and elected representatives, Democrats and Republicans alike, flail about while they wait for the economy to get better on its own, not because of and often in spite of the billions we may have wasted with misdirected, ineffective policies and programs. Whoever’s in office when the recovery occurs takes credit for it, and we move on. That’s not happening this time, that is, the economy isn’t recovering fast enough on its own because there are structural issues, big things wrong with the economy which will take time for it to fix, time we don’t have.

Every now and then, I take myself way too seriously. I find myself facing what appear to be difficult, complex problems, the kind that make your head hurt when you think about solving them. But then eventually, thank goodness, there comes a moment. You know what I’m talking about. It’s the one when I blow my diet on the grounds that stress is more harmful to my health than fat, after an hour or two of mindless TV, followed by a pass-out nap on my couch. It’s the moment when I realize that the problem wasn’t that complicated after all. I strip the problem of its extraneous detail and focus on its core elements, and a simple, reasonable, often elegant albeit sometimes radical sounding solution presents itself. This is one of those times.
Keep reading…

Congressional Dorms

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Remember college? How the dorms had a way of making all freshmen equal regardless of what their parents did for a living or how much money they made? The way they forced the intermingling of nerds with the cool guys, the English majors with the engineering and science tools – and eventually, in more recent years, the girls with the boys, the blacks with the whites, the straight with the gay? It was nice, because dorm life helped open our minds, encouraging us to relate to others who were different than we were, to appreciate these differences and not get bent out of shape by them.

Maybe we should take the same approach to growing a better, more civil, more effective Congress.
Continue…

Things We Can Do For Free To Put People Back To Work

Wednesday, August 8, 2011

Hi. While spending money to put everyone back to work may be necessary – although our President and Congress haven’t a clue how to do that – there are some things that we can do immediately that won’t cost anyone a dime.
Continue…

Who’s holding who hostage?

Thursday, August 4, 2011

FYI, “The Wordfeeder” is neither a Democrat or Republican, Tea Party or otherwise, but an honest-to-goodness registered Independent. As such, I just call ‘em as I see them, regardless of who I agree with or offend.

That having been said, consider the following TV drama scenario. Large men wearing ski masks, what else, … Just ski masks. They’re naked from the waste down. ..break into your office demanding that the President of your firm, who doesn’t know you from Adam, turn over the key to the men’s room which is kept locked at all times, precisely to avoid having thugs like them from going to the bathroom without permission. Okay, I think we can all agree that the large men are “holding you hostage.” Or can we?

Suppose, from the point of view of the large, masked men, you (your firm) posed a much greater threat when your management leased lobby space to a Starbucks and then withheld access to your lavatories. Maybe the large, masked men are basically nice guys who just feel they have no choice. Having made repeated polite, entirely civil requests for the lavatory key, they are at their wits end and feel, quite possibly correctly so, that they’ve run out of options.

Management, who considers you dispensable, particularly when issues as significant as public restroom access are on the line, tells the masked men that they should put their guns down, leave the building and they’ll talk about it later, maybe.

Who’s responsible for this crisis? The hostage takers, or the people who have acted, depending upon your point of view, with reckless disregard to the welfare of the general public?

As you probably know, our Congress went on vacation immediately after passing their debt limit extension legislation, leaving over 70,000 Americans without income pending resolution of a dispute over renewed FAA funding. Not only are these Americans temporarily out of work, there is over $1 billion of taxes which our government desperately needs that will go uncollected until the House and Senate get back from vacation. This is an example of audacity, of self-serving politics, of reckless incompetence of biblical proportions.

The Democrats in the Senate are claiming that the Republicans in the house are “holding them hostage” by approving additional FAA funding contingent upon putting an end to government subsidies of minor airline routes which we can’t afford to continue. (My wife believes that no one should be allowed to fly distances of less than 500 miles, and I agree with her, at least in principle.) Well, I think the Democrats are confused. I think it’s the Democrats, President Obama included, who want the Republicans to drop their demand and pass yet another “clean” funding bill, and they’ll talk about cutting expenses later. To which I say, at the risk of sounding like a Republican (ick), “Oh, yeah. When?”

Time’s up.

-wf

Cigarettes

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Why, if cigarettes are so toxic, so bad for you – which they are – and so addictive, aren’t they illegal?

The FDA has just announced new images, scary, revolting images intended to further discourage people from smoking. The Surgeon General warnings were apparently insufficiently severe to get the job done. What a surprise. Does our FDA not understand the concept of addiction? Apparently not. Either that, or it’s not really serious about putting an end to smoking. If the FDA was serious, it would have halted the manufacture and sale of cigarettes a long time ago.

When it comes to tobacco, to what model of public health management does the FDA subscribe? Instead of protecting us from the hazard, they way they would by not approving or pulling a deadly medicine, they chose instead to issue warnings, and leave it up to us to stop consuming. Can you imagine them announcing that, I don’t know, a popular cough syrup for children is deadly, followed by a casual, “Good luck with that.”

I wonder what the costs have been to our society and to the individual families most directly affected by smoking-related illnesses, compared to, let’s say, heroine and other hard drugs which are illegal.

So why, given all we know about the dangers of smoking, can you still buy cigarettes at your local grocery store and gas station? Certainly there is nothing of a moral nature stopping the manufacturers from making and selling their product. I mean, ask yourself what kind of company, what person sells something he or she knows is killing its customers? Wow. It’s as unbelievable as it is disgusting. Would you do that? For any amount of money? Or is money what it’s all about, and we’re just quibbling over the price? Careful, that last question was the criterion that George Bernard Shaw once used to define being a whore.

The fact is, it is all about the money. About the money that’s made growing and selling tobacco and the political contributions and lobbyists all that money supports. Okay, so money talks, and the producers and facilitators – from farmers to Phillip Morris, to the advertising agencies and media, to our elected officials – are all a bunch of you know whats. The question is, what does that make us for letting it happen?

-wf

Raising the Debt Limit: A Reasonable Compromise

Friday, June 17, 2011

I don’t want our government to increase the debt ceiling. I want us, as a nation, to start living within the limits of our income. Even better, I want to start paying down the debt we already owe before we choke on the interest on that debt. Everybody knows we’re way over-leveraged and that it’s killing us.

That having been said, I don’t think our Congress will or can cut enough in the next few weeks before we hit the current ceiling to make an increase in that ceiling unnecessary. So what do I propose?

(Notice how we bloggers write this stuff as if anybody is really listening? It makes us feel better and, who knows, every once and a while someone with a microphone or elected office reads something and says, “You know, that’s not a bad idea.”)

I propose we increase the debt ceiling — presumably to give Congress time to effect huge cuts in spending that are long, long overdue – but only on the condition that all new debt we incur be to individual Americans.

Why Americans? Because I don’t want to borrow more from other countries – China, for example – our indebtedness to which can affect how we behave internationally.

Why individuals? Because I don’t want corporations to own any more of America, not even and especially not commercial and investment banks even though their resources may be largely derived from individual investors. These are entities that already have too much influence on government policy.

Why Americans? Because who better to earn the interest we pay?

So, am I good at this or what?

Oh, one other thing… I want these new American investors – from kids to working class and professionals, to retirees, the ordinary you and me out there who can invest one to a million dollars, whatever we can afford – to agree to defer our interest until the economy is back on its feet and we’re showing a significant budget surplus. Who else but American’s would be willing to do this for our country? What better way – other than by voting – to involve Americans in resolution of our fiscal crisis?

-wf

The Weiner Resignation: Who is Congress kidding?

Thursday, June 16, 2011

And so Congressman, now ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner has resigned. He did a bad, bad thing. Whether he’s mentally or emotionally ill or not, the Democrat party leadership wanted him out. He was a distraction. Congress is no place, so they told us, for the likes of Mr. Weiner’s bizarre and lewd behavior.

Really? What a joke. Would our Representatives and Senators even know bizarre and lewd behavior if they tripped over it?

Let me get this straight. It’s not okay for a single member of Congress to have an illness, a bona fide disorder that needs treatment by medical professionals, but it is okay for Congress to spend us into oblivion, effectively bankrupting the United States, to squander billions, even trillions of dollars, to devise or endorse useless social and economic programs which often completely miss the point – all while neglecting many of the most important problems we face. Wow. Through gross incompetence and selfishness, they (both houses, and let’s throw in the President for good measure) have irreparably hurt our country, as a whole, and millions of its individual families in profound financial and other ways. I can’t… No, I refuse to believe they are what our founding fathers and mothers had in mind.

Maybe Congressman Weiner should have resigned, but then so should the other 534 yahoos. What nerve they have to pick on this one guy who clearly has a personal problem while adroitly avoiding culpability for the unimaginably huge and hurtful mess they’ve created.

Maybe you’re relived that Congressman Weiner has resigned so that Congress can get back to business. I guess that’s a good thing, but then I’m not entirely sure what business they’re talking about. Personally, I can’t wait for the next election.

-wf

Double Standard: The Anthony Weiner Business

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Anthony Weiner – Congressman, husband and soon to be father – has made a mess out of his life and career. He’s been unfaithful to his marriage and has, in no small way, betrayed the trust of his constituents by allowing his influence in Congress to be significantly diminished and then lying about his behavior. That many have called for him to resign may be understandable, but it’s wrong. It’s a manifestation of significant hypocrisy and immaturity on their part and of a double standard that’s well worth pointing out.

Congressman Weiner is sick. I’m neither a psychologist nor psychiatrist, but I’m pretty sure that the nature and extent of his behavior are over the lines that define the wide normal portion of the bell curve in which most of us reside.

If he had cancer or had been in a serious auto accident, everyone would be wishing him well and a speedy recovery. He’d take as much sick leave as he needed and return to work when he was up to it. Yes, if his illness or injury was so severe that he couldn’t return to work, could no longer be effective at what he was hired to do, that would be that – but he shouldn’t be pressured to resign before it’s determined that a recovery isn’t possible, that he can no longer do his job.

Sure, Congressman Wiener’s work depends heavily upon how people react to him. In very real terms, he’s been disfigured. The question is, if an otherwise productive colleague is, literally or figuratively, hard to look at, hard to talk to, is that his or her problem, or ours? Where do we draw the line? What’s the right thing for us to do?

What about the lie? People in auto accidents and who contract cancer don’t lie about their situations? Actually, there was a time not too long ago when they did, deny or at least avoid telling people they had cancer and certain other diseases fearing the consequences of adverse workplace reaction. Even in these more enlightened times, people with mental illnesses are still embarrassed by them. Same thing for homosexuality, which is a personal attribute, not an illness, but can still adversely impact personal and professional interaction.

Congressman Weiner has an illness, a mental or emotional illness, but an illness nonetheless. Lying about it is not only understandable in light of the double standard which is evident in the reaction of his colleagues and others, it is symptomatic of his disorder. He shouldn’t resign, certainly not yet, not until medical professionals determine that a recovery can’t be accomplished, that continuing to work is not conducive – from his, the patient’s point of view – to his attaining good mental health.

However bizarre and disturbing his behavior, we need to go out of our way to be tolerant and supportive, to treat him as we would anyone else who wasn’t well.

-wf

The Washington Post: Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Sunday, March 20, 2011

I wasn’t going to write this. I wasn’t going to write anything today. I’ve got work to do coming out my tush, but I can’t help myself.

We, here in America, tend to focus on the crisis at hand. Charlie Sheen’s self-destruction was, thank goodness, replaced in the headlines, and on television in particular, by the mass destruction in Japan, still underway. And today, coverage of Japan is running behind what’s happening in Libya, even though the former is at least equally interesting, deadly and profound, if not much more so.

Yes, there’s only so much paper a newspaper can afford to publish, only so much air time, even in today’s world of 24 hour cable and Internet news.

Unfortunately, we’re still fighting in Iraq and especially in Afghanistan. These are wars of which our President and his administration are keenly aware, which is why we waited, maybe too long, to take any action in Libya without UN endorsement and coalition support. Nobody, least of all the President, wants to talk about these other actions, not in any overt, explicit way. They long ago became yesterday’s news.

Our long-term presence in Iraq and Afghanistan continues to suck billions from our starving economy, destroying the lives of our soldiers and their families, not to mention the innocent people in the countries where we are engaged, while fueling our enemies’ anti-American propaganda. No, these other actions are not something our government wants to talk about. It’s not something that helps get politicians elected, and the sense is that we’re all stressed out enough already, what with the slowness of our economic recovery and all the other bad news on the air.

Is one major crisis at a time all we can take? Heaven forbid we should let multiple, simultaneous crises affect our view of government, social and economic policy.

Not to worry. Thank goodness we have a free press to keep us real. But wait… I read the Sunday Washington Post. In today’s paper, the right side headline is about Libya, the color picture on the left, a view of (and story about) Three Mile Island with references to what’s happening in Japan. The front page section is 22 pages long, the “Outlook” section, 6 pages. And on not one of those 28 total pages is there a single discussion of what’s happening in Iraq or Afghanistan. They’re obviously just not that important, not as important as “Thomas Jefferson (High School) adds English help amid debate” on the front page, or “Amtrak renames station for Biden” in the second page “Digest,” or “Visiting India, Palin talks tough on China, other topics” on the third page, and so on.

-wf