“It only seems fair.”

Suggestion of the Day
Monday, August 11, 2008

If it’s illegal for us to lie to the government, why isn’t it illegal for the government to lie to us?

By “the government,” I’m referring, of course, to the President.

I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

True, there’s nothing in the Oath of Office which promises that the President will be truthful when he talks to the American people about matters of significant importance – although voracity might be construed from the words “faithfully execute” and Presidential lying is no way to “preserve” the Constitution.

No, for the President, there is nothing like the laws and simple process which compel ordinary citizens to tell the truth when testifying before Congress, in the courts, and to various other authorities. It is as if the American people are a somehow lesser entity, less authoritative, literally, and less deserving of respect than the institutions we have ourselves created to serve our purposes. We’re left, instead, with little more than the hope that our President is a person of integrity upon whom Congress and the American people can rely for the information they need to understand our circumstances and act accordingly.

How arrogant of any President to lie to us. What a grotesque perversion of the core principles of our democracy. What gives any President the right, if not simply that he or she can so easily get away with it? Maybe we should do something about that.


Site Meter

“Senator Obama, you’re black. So get over it already.”

Give me a break.
Sunday, August 10, 2008

When the McCain campaign ran the ad that featured Senator Obama with Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, the Obama campaign and many of his supporters immediately declared it racist. It was because the Senator was portrayed next to two young white women – as if it would have been okay if they’d been black.

So let me get this straight. Is it racist of the Republican Party to be running a white candidate because, during the inevitable debates and town meetings when the two standard bearers are standing next to each other, the juxtaposition of the two will emphasize that Barack Obama is African American – while no one would have noticed if they were both black?

Will Senator Obama refuse to pick a white person – heaven forbid, a youngish white female person – to be his running mate for fear, whenever they appear together, that voters will be reminded that he’s black, or not white, whichever is the worse point of view for his prospects?

No doubt about it, Senator Obama – perhaps as a service to those of us whose only contact with his campaign is via radio – has been reminding us, again and again, that he’s black, daring us not to vote for him. He’s the one who has been instigating the issue of race. The not so subtle strategy is to make those of us who don’t care what color he is, which describes by far and away the vast majority of the electorate, feel bad about not voting for him. Guilt and embarrassment, even on behalf of generations past, die hard. It’s a replay, but on a much grander scale, of what John Kennedy did when he was the first Catholic to run for President. Rather than let his Catholicism be an unspoken, even subconscious issue, he was the one who raised the subject to associate a vote for his opponent as a vote against his (Kennedy’s) religious affiliation.

Will it work for Senator Obama? Not if he overdoes it, a milestone he may have already passed. Beyond that point, he risks a negative reaction, not because he’s black, but because it’s fast becoming a nuisance issue, distracting from whatever positive advantages an Obama Presidency might have to offer. Racism is a negative message which underestimates the intelligence of the American voter.

Why keep pressing the issue of race? Because he thinks he needs it to distract the public from the real issue: his lack of experience. (Just between you and me, I’m not sure I like what this strategy implies about how Senator Obama would run our government, and our foreign policy in particular. It’s not behavior that encourages my confidence or trust.) No one cares what color he is, certainly not enough voters to cost him the election. The question is, does he know what he’s doing? Will he make a good President of the United States? It’s a question that deserves 100% of his and our attention.


Site Meter

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Short Fiction for Guests of the WordFeeder
Thursday, August 7, 2008                                   
Printable version… Self-Fulfilling Prophecy PDF

Had there been anyone there to tell the story, it would have seemed to take forever for the glass to tumble from the edge of the desk to the floor which was no longer where it used to be, losing its few leftover drops of last night’s wine along the way to oblivion.

The sound began like rolling thunder, slightly off key, building, not gradually enough, to a deafening crescendo no one would be there to hear, a perverse celebration of something someone had anticipated long ago, perhaps no more than a lucky guess, or maybe a quirk of time and space Einstein’s disciples would one day figure out.  It was the birthday of a legend – fodder for endless speculation and mind-numbing over-coverage by the network and cable news.

Twenty minutes earlier…

It was a postcard morning, as it had been every day since they arrived in Nassau to celebrate their fifth anniversary.  The view out their eighth floor ocean suite might as well have been painted on the glass.  The door to the balcony had been open all night, the breezes that were everywhere on Paradise Island pulling the sheer curtain outward, like the flowing white dress of some unseen spirit that had come to watch over them.  Below, on the beach by the cove for which the hotel was named, the morning sun reflected off the water coloring the white under-feathers of the sea birds an iridescent turquoise that seemed unreal.

Well-rested, they were up early, anxious to get their cabana chairs in the perfect position for a long day of reading, writing, talking about everything and nothing in particular.  Now and then, when it was too hot, they cool themselves with walks in the warm ocean water, and virgin banana daiquiris artfully prepared by one of the always friendly locals at the nearest beach bar.  Their first five years had blown by.  This week at the Atlantis complex was just the long overdue break they needed.

Atlantis was on Paradise Island, separated by only Nassau harbor from New Providence Island in the Bahamas, a billion dollar resort with hotels, beaches, elaborate pools and water activities, all built around the theme of its namesake, the legend of Atlantis, complete with Hollywood’s best quality ruins of the great city that once disappeared beneath the sea.  Andy and Carolyn were staying in the more exclusive, more adult, less Disney section of the resort – the hotel with the two story lobby with no walls, the Mesa Grill, and cushioned islands in the middle of the pool to which waiters waded out to bring you drinks made from rum and fresh fruit.  They planned to eat at the Grill tonight, either that or go out for conch fritters and shrimp at “Bad News Jack” in the city.  They figured they were young, and their colons could take it.

“Honey,” Carolyn was too busy packing her beach bag to see what it was all about, “you’re getting an e-mail from Amanda,” his younger sister.

“I was wondering why we hadn’t heard from her.”  Missing a birthday or anniversary wasn’t like Amanda.  She was a professor of ancient history at Columbia, and had taken the summer off to do research in Athens on the history of some of the ancient writers.  Andy sat down, double clicked, and began reading to himself.

“What’s she have to say?” Carolyn shouted past the open double doors to the bathroom, squeezing herself into the bathing suit she had optimistically purchased one size too small just for their vacation.

“I don’t know.  She seems anxious.  Doesn’t even mention our anniv…   Wait a minute.  What’s she talking about?”  He was quite for moment while he read the next few paragraphs.  “Apparently, she was doing research on this one writer, who was writing about another writer who he – the first one – claimed had originated the ancient legend of Atlantis.”

“That’s nice,” Carolyn was standing behind him now, her hands on his shoulders, his arms folded in front of their laptop along the edge of the desk near their bed.  “Let’s get out of here.  I know exactly where I want to sit.”  There was this one lone palm tree right at the beach, maybe 20 feet from the where the water and dry sand broke even.  Sitting under it was like having your own, personal oasis.

“Hold on for second.  She says the originator wasn’t claiming to be writing about something that had happened, but was making a prediction, a prophesy about something that would happen hundreds of years in the future.  The guy was some kind of scientist, pretty advanced for his time and actually offered what she thinks might be some crude mathematical calculation as to when it would occur.  She’s asked a friend of hers – some Greek geologist she’s been dating…”

“Give me a break.”

“…to help with the translation.  She wants us to…”

“Hey, com’on,” she told him, leaning forward to kiss him on the back of his neck, just below his right ear, causing the usual instinctive crunch of his neck toward his shoulder.  “You can finish reading and get back to her later.”

“I don’t know, she seems worked up.  I mean, look at this writing, not even taking the time to proof what she’s written.  It’s not her…”

Carolyn moved her hands from his shoulders to around his neck, faking strangulation.

Andy didn’t need convincing.  “Yeh, yeh,” he started to say as he rose up from his seat.  “Head for the door.  I’ll get my hat.”

Turning to her right to look out and over the balcony.  “If you ask me, every room should have its own waterslide directly to the beach.”

Carolyn left for the door, pressing the button to ask housekeeping to make up their room while they were out.  Andy, right behind her, just barely slipped into the hallway before the door chunked shut behind him, and they were off, fake racing each other on their way to the elevators.

Minutes later, in their room, the sound of the ocean wafting through the open glass doors was interrupted by the “boop, boop” of the breaking news ticker across the bottom of the notebook’s screen.  “USGS scientists are reporting widespread, significant seismic activity in the British West Indies,” the message began.  A wine glass next to the computer, still showing the last few ruby drops left over from the night before, began to vibrate, the bottom of the stem taping, first slowly, and now more rapidly, as it drifted slowly across the glass surface of their desk, and the screen on their laptop went blank.

-wf

What to read more? Just click here and pick a title you like.

Copyright as of the title date or earlier, by me.
(I write the WordFeeder blog.)  All rights reserved.
Email WordFeeder@verizon.net for additional information.

Hypocrisy of the Day: Steroids at the Olympics

Saturday, August 9, 2008

The US and International Olympic Committees are opposed to the use of steroids to enhance athletic performance.  They are not, however, equally opposed to the use high tech bathing suits like the Speedo LZR, specially designed track shoes which are different for each foot to enhance traction and stability on longer-distance events, and ice laden vests which runners wear just prior to the race to lower their core body temperatures – just to mention a few.

What’s the difference?  If we’re going to allow the use…  no, the extensive use of technology to enhance athletic performance, why not legalize the use of steroids for the same purpose?

-wf


Site Meter

Quote of the Day: The Debate Barack Obama Can’t Handle

Sunday, April 27, 2008

“Of the two Democrats running, turns out it’s the woman who’s the only one with the balls to be President.  After all these primaries, debates, ads, soundbites and episodes of “Hardball,” I’ve finally realized what it is that I like most about Hillary Clinton.”  – wf

Our government needs work.  No question about it, but it’s beginning to look like the change Senator Obama keeps promising serves a more personal objective, to remake the political process into something with which he, personally, feels more comfortable.

Unfortunately, we don’t have the time, nor is the Barack Obama model for government necessarily a good thing.  We need a President who can be effective in the context of our current government, and a general election candidate who can beat John McCain in the war of confrontational politics he and his Republican party are going to wage. 


Site Meter

Quote of the Day: The arrogance of Barack Obama’s rhetoric.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Over the next few days, Senator Obama will use his considerable oratorical skills, and blind allegiance of his Rally People, to refocus attention from the substance of what he said yesterday, as quoted below, to the economy and plight of blue collar working people.  It will be the same redirection he accomplished when he responded to questions about his relationship with Pastor Jeremiah Wright by shifting everyone’s attention to the issue of race which was never the point.

His supporters will look for the truth in what he says, without regard to its implications.  They will excuse his arrogance because he tells them he’s only saying what we all know to be true.  His honesty is brutal, and therefore above reproach.  By proclaiming that what he says is what we already think, it must be so.  Why else would we believe it?  It’s logic that doesn’t make any sense.  It’s doublespeak political slight of hand at its very best.

Working people are not simple, they are not more easily led or coerced than more educated, more financially successful Americans.  Nor do they “cling” to their religion, rather than believe in it and rely on its power and direction, any more so than the Senator subscribes to his own spiritual foundations.

Working people do not grunt their way into their opinions about immigration or international trade, nor are their conclusions on those or any other subjects less valuable because they may be conditioned by different economic and social circumstances than those of their more privileged countrymen.  Indeed, they are not less privileged or less happy because they work in different jobs at lower rates of compensation.  The only meaningful difference is that many of them are unable to afford the medical care, quality education, personal safety and other basics of our national wealth that they and their families deserve to share.  Fixing that is not about rhetoric per se, but about the specifics of intelligent government and economic policy.

Is the Senator’s language his way of bringing us together, or a just a common strategy for eliciting support by making a given segment of our society angry enough to vote against his opponents?

Rally People, your candidate is not the second coming of anything.  He is nothing more, or less, than an exceptionally skilled politician self-packaged to leverage our sensitivities, distract us from his inexperience and lack of substance, and to pander to the understandable optimism and hope of all Americans that an elected leader can somehow make our lives better.

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them, and they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.  By Barack Obama, at a fundraiser yesterday in San Francisco, bold print added by me.

 


Site Meter

IM

Short Fiction for Guests of the WordFeeder
Saturday, April 12, 2008

“Hey.”  Robert Brent, EVP for Media Operations, looked up from his desk at the man standing in the doorway to his office.  Gesturing quickly with his the pen in his right hand, “Come on in.  …Just give me a second to finish this,” he went back to writing unintelligible notes on the single sheet of white paper in the only clear space he had left on his desk.

Finished, for now, he looked up.  Sitting on the edge of one of the two guest chairs was the rumpled Management Associate he used for everything.  Not yet 30, Will would never make the pages of GQ.  Other than not looking good in a suit, there wasn’t much he couldn’t do.  He was a natural, a person executives like Brent used, but also respected, a rare combination given the intense in-company competition that was the world of their business.  More to the point, Will was good, really good, but without the experience to be a threat to his mentor.  Some day probably, but not yet.

“Here’s the transcript I told you about.”  Will sat up slightly, leaning forward to hand a copy across the desk.  “It’s less than 20 minutes old.”

Charles:           “I thought you weren’t working late tonight.”

 Will sat there, already familiar with the text, while Robert read it for himself, out loud.  Charles was brash, sometimes hard to take, but the most effective media buyer they had.

Adriana:          “ I’m working on tomorrow’s presentation.  Leave me alone.”

Charles:           You could always delete my e-mail address.”

Adriana:          “I didn’t think I had any choice.”

Charles:           You don’t, not if you want to keep your precious reputation intact.”

Adriana:          “Stop it.  I don’t want to have this conversation on-line.”

Charles:           “They watch our e-mail.  IM is live.  We’re okay.”

Robert looked up.  “I thought he was right.  How’d you get this?”

“It’s the new kid in IT.  The one we picked up on work release from “juvi.”  There’s nothing he can’t do.”

“Hm.  That’s scary.  Can we trust him?”

“Are you kidding?  We don’t even understand him.  Our only hope is that he likes us.”

“Great,” and Robert looked down again at the transcript, mumbling almost to himself, “Find out what he wants and make sure he gets some.”

Adriana:         (No response.)

She’d been there almost a year.  Just three years since her MBA.  Very competitive.  Attractive, but not so much as to be distracting.  Hard working, and obviously smart, there was something Robert didn’t trust about her, an insincerity he felt, but couldn’t confirm.  She’d have to get past Charles to make any real progress, but didn’t have the contacts in the media, and was relegated to handling buys in the smaller markets.

Charles:           “I’ve got another friend I’d like you to meet.”

Adriana:          “Screw you, and I hope they are listening.”

Charles:          “You did great.  We’d never have gotten that pricing without you.”

Adriana:          “That just happened, you jerk.   I actually liked the guy.  So it helped the company.  Good, but it’s not something I’m doing on a regular basis.”

Charles:          “You’ll do whatever I tell you to do.”

Adriana:           (Pause.)  “What makes you think I won’t print and drop this on Brent’s desk in the morning?”

Charles:          “Because we’ll both be fired.  Because by the time Will gets done spreading the word, you’ll be lucky to find work waiting tables in Sioux Falls.”

Adriana:         “Up yours.  I’m going home.  Stay away from me, or I’m calling a lawyer, whatever it costs me.”

“Is that all there was?”  Robert was hoping for more.

“That was it.”

“Are we sure it’s real?”

“They were both in their offices, on their computers when I walked by a few minutes ago.  Besides, neither of them would know how to fake their IP addresses, or have a reason to write this if they knew we were listening.”

Robert wasn’t so sure.  You could tell the way he looked away from Will, turning and then tilting his head slightly from side to side, and did that small thing with his lips.

“ …So what do you want to do?  We’ll lose clients, not to mention Board support for your expansion strategy if we’re slapped with an harassment suit and it makes the paper.”

“I’ll call San Francisco.  There’s an opening there.  It’ll be a promotion for her, and Hastings owes me one.  As for Charles, I don’t want him to know we have this.  Let’s see what he does next.”

“Good night, guys.”  It was Adriana, coat over her arm, the weight of her heavy leather briefcase forcing the one shoulder higher than the other.  “See you tomorrow.”

Will, turning in his chair, raised his eyebrows, his way of saying, “Hi.”

Brent went out of his way to be pleasant.  “Thanks for staying.  Good luck with the presentation.”  And was that.

Fourteen minutes and a short taxi ride later, she kicked the door to her apartment closed with the heel of her shoe.  “Hey, how’d it go?”  Dropping her coat and briefcase onto the hardwood, she wasted no time unbuttoning her blouse, kicking off the comfortable business heels she’d been wearing that day without breaking her stride.

The kid on work release, his red floppy hair in disarray, looked up from the copy of Maxim he’d picked up from the newsstand on the corner.  “I’m guessing they’ll be recommending you for the opening in San Francisco as soon as they open in the morning.”

“And Charles?”

“He hasn’t a clue.”

-wf

What to read more? Just click here and pick a title you like.

Copyright as of the title date or earlier, by me.
(I write the WordFeeder blog.)  All rights reserved.
Email WordFeeder@verizon.net for additional information.

Popularity Contest: Katie Couric for Prom Queen

Saturday, April 12, 2008
(Second in the series beginning with “Popularity Contest:  Barack Obama for Student Council President,” published April 5, 2008.)

Corporate America has a tendency to make exceptional things mediocre.  Katie Couric is one of them – not personally, but her public persona as the anchor for the CBS Evening News.

I’m a big fan of Katie whose intelligent reporting and ingratiating way made NBC’s Today Show worth watching.  And so I followed her when she moved to CBS a year and half ago, to the point of watching back to back newscasts, first by Brian Williams at 6:30 PM, and then Katie at 7 o’clock which is how they play in my market.

Her first few shows were an excellent beginning, like mini-versions of “60 Minutes” – “30 Minutes” some reviewers called it – but with personality worth watching.  The format wasn’t perfect, but had the potential to offer us, finally, a more interesting, more informative take, not just on the news in the simplest sense, but on what was really happening.

Unfortunately, because ratings did not immediately respond, CBS News senior management proceeded to do its spineless, least creative best to force the format, and Katie with it, into becoming one more talking head.  Apparently, none of these wuskids ever took “Marketing 101:  Product Differentiation,” nor were the aware of the legendary, albeit slow to catch on successes of “The Dick Van Dyke Show,” “Seinfeld,” and, more recently, “30 Rock.”  I know they’re not news shows, but the examples are still valid.

And now they wonder why they’re still in third place.  In the process of making their product ordinary, they reduced the ratings to nothing more than a popularity contest, and lost.  Imitation may be flattering, but it’s not necessarily smart business in a creative medium like television.  Katie Couric is not supposed to be Brian Williams with you know what.  She is her own person whose unique talents should have been nurtured and given time to attract the attention they deserve.

Not wanting to blame themselves, they’re replacing the one good thing the Evening News has going for it.  Sad to report, and with considerable irony, between anchor and network management, Katie is the only one with balls.


Site Meter

Why I don’t want to nominate Barack Obama for President.

Sunday, April 6, 2008

I started writing these notes in response to a comment made by “Paul V” yesterday which I’m going to publish in a few minutes.  His comments are severe and, I think, largely unwarranted, but agreeing with me is not a criterion for guests who visit WordFeeder.  Quite to the contrary, I like the openness of this form of communication, and want to encourage the broad based exchange of ideas which it makes possible.

I’m opposed to the candidacy of Barack Obama for several reasons, some general, some specific.  Here they are, in no particular order.

He’s inexperienced, not just a little bit, but greatly, not just with respect to domestic economic and other issues and international relations, but also with the process of getting things done in Washington.

His concept of governance by consensus, that he can invariably talk his way to a meaningful solution is naïve and, in some situations related to national security, perhaps dangerously so.  To a great extent, leadership requires the will and ability to take action when consensus is impossible.  I’m not confident he has what it takes.

His words are eloquent and stirring, but lack substance.  I have the sense that he’s playing with us, the consummate salesman who smooth talks his way past the fact that he really doesn’t know his product.

I find his blatant use of the race issue to bait white and black Americans into voting for him to be annoying, petty, a classic example of the old school politics which he purports to oppose.  It tends to be divisive, and not at all constructive, which is surprising for a candidate who keeps reminding us how he’s intends to bring everyone together.  America, at its very best, is, as it should be, an amalgamation of differences, not one big happy family.  I don’t care what color he is, and I’m not sure there are many Americans who do.

I’m troubled by his long standing and continuing relationship with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and find his claims to the effect that he never heard the Pastor’s statements or was aware of the church’s publications to be incredulous.  (As a parent, I wonder how he discussed the Pastor’s sermons with his young, impressionable children who accompanied the Senator and his wife to services.)

I find his repeated claim that “I opposed this war from the start” to be true, but a case of fortunate hindsight.  If you actually read the text of his October 2, 2002, speech, you’ll perhaps understand why I believe his opposition to the use of military force in Iraq, in light of the threats to our national security which he acknowledged, to be proof positive of his naiveté and tendency to pander to his audience.

I’m concerned that he can’t win, that John McCain and the Republican Party will go after him in a way a less experienced, less vetted candidate will not handle effectively.

I’ve written on all these points over the past few months, in pieces which will explain my concerns in greater detail.  Please help yourself to my archives and recent postings.


Site Meter

Popularity Contest: “Barack Obama for Student Council President”

Saturday, April 5, 2008

“If, on the other hand, we thought of the campaign as if we stockholders hiring someone to be our national CEO, Senator Clinton would win hands down.”

Just when I was beginning to enjoy being an adult, this campaign for President has made me feel like I’m back in high school.  It was a place where people were elected to Student Council based almost exclusively on their popularity, with little regard for capability.  There were no real issues, and the Council had no authority, so it didn’t matter.  Running for President of the United States should be different.

Just because we call it a “popular vote” doesn’t necessarily suggest that we don’t care about the ability of the candidate to actually do something.  I say that knowing full well that our current President was elected based entirely upon his popularity, having not the slightest idea what he was doing.  So how’s that worked out for us?

Barack Obama is popular.  Hillary Clinton is not.  If this were high school, he’d be elected.  If, on the other hand, we thought of the campaign as if we stockholders hiring someone to be our national CEO, Senator Clinton would win hands down.

Last month, the Obama campaign raised a whopping $40 million through hundreds of thousands of individual contributions averaging less than $100.  (The Clinton campaign raised $20 million, which is impressive, but chump change by Obama standards.)  Everybody feels very good about this because it suggests that a President elected without the need for special interest money will be free from its influence.  He or she will still have to deal with those special interests to get anything done, but won’t literally owe them anything.  In the world of compromise that is Washington, I’m not sure it makes any difference, but doing away with large contributions, personal or corporate, was the right thing to do.

Unfortunately, the effect of removing large contributions from the process has been to give a substantial advantage to the most popular candidate.  Make no mistake about it.  The fact that Barack Obama can outspend Hillary Clinton 2:1 in the remaining primaries will make a difference in the outcome of those elections.  It’s a difference that has nothing to do with anything more than sheer exposure.  Obama supporters may think they are part of a new age of politics, but they’re buying the election – probably of the wrong candidate – nonetheless.  Electing a President shouldn’t be on a par with letting advertising convince you to use one brand of deodorant over another.

It’s too late for this election, but there are some things we can do over the next four years before we nominate and elect another President to make popularity for popularity’s sake less of a factor.

For one thing, we need a national primary, no more than 30 days prior to the nominating conventions.  Popularity tends to dominate the early stages of any campaign.  It’s natural, like dating.  Superficial attributes are the first thing you notice.  Getting to know someone takes time.  People who voted, and delegates who were elected in the early primaries may have changed their minds by the time the last primaries and conventions are held months later.

Second, do away with caucuses.  Caucuses discourage the participation of voters who prefer, and have every right to a secret ballot, who may not feel comfortable asserting themselves or being exposed to intimidation by more ardent advocates in a public, sometimes rowdy venue, and who simply may not be available during the relatively brief time during which the caucus is held.  I’m sorry to demean the style of many fellow Americans – not that sorry, actually – but caucuses in this day and age are a joke, a poor, not stellar or classic interpretation of democratic process.

And we need to replace all personal or corporate contributions, large or small, direct or through political action committees, with public campaign funding.  Based on some reasonable qualification process, give the serious candidates the money they need to run a campaign sufficient to acquaint the voting public with their programs, experience and personality – but let them allocate those funds as they see fit.

Let’s put the candidates on equal footing in so far as campaign financing is concerned, and leave it to them to win or lose the election based on more substantive issues.  Whatever the source of their money, you don’t want someone buying an election by overwhelming his opponent with media exposure.  As for the miracle of Internet campaign funding, people should be voting with their voices and at the polls, not with their wallets.

We want a popular vote, not a popularity contest.  In politics, it is not true that you get what you pay for.


Site Meter