Accepting Responsibility for the Uselessness of Congress

Saturday, September 6, 2008

The Obama campaign is fond of reminding us that the Bush Administration has been a pathetic excuse for government, arguing in the process that a John McCain Presidency will be nothing more than a reincarnation of it, which I don’t buy.

Will someone – perhaps the McCain campaign if anyone over there is listening – please remind Senators Obama and Biden that it’s been a Democrat-controlled Congress for the past two years, including both of them in the Senate, and ask them what they have to show for it? Ask Senator Obama why, if he’s President, and without any profound change in the party mix in both houses, will Congress be any more productive or helpful in accomplishing his agenda?


Site Meter

Clinton v. Palin for President, 2012

“If this idea doesn’t get you to vote for John McCain, nothing will.”
Saturday, September 6, 2008

Attention Hillary Clinton supporters (of which I was one). If this idea doesn’t get you to vote for John McCain, nothing will.

As someone who believes that Barack Obama is not ready or right, even if he was ready, for the position for which he is running, I’ve been looking for an excuse to vote for McCain. The addition of Sarah Palin to the ticket, and his bold criticism and repudiation of his own party at its convention, no less, are beginning to persuade me. I’m not quite there yet, but now it’s occurred to me…

As it turns out, I’ve been considering voting for John McCain for some time simply because I believe he’ll be a one term President, and not a bad one at that. Let’s assume I’m right, that his age pretty much assures us that he’ll be a one term President. Now flash forward four years.

Senator Obama won’t run again. He may want to, but the Democratic Party won’t let him. He had his chance, and now needs to give someone else his, or her turn. The Republicans run former Governor, now 49 year old Vice President Sarah Palin, and the Democrats finally get around to doing what they should have four years earlier. They nominate 65 year old Senator Hillary Clinton.

Clinton v. Palin for President, 2012. How ‘bout that?


Site Meter

The Media’s Attack on Sarah Palin: One Father’s Point of View

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

The same media – television, cable news, the newspapers, you name it – that has gone out of its way to encourage discussion of Sarah Palin’s family life has, at the same time, demonstrated the self-serving audacity of also pointing out that many women find the nature of these questions inherently prejudicial and offensive. Many women do. All women should. The assumption that these questions are somehow more relevant, even just more interesting for female candidates than for their male counterparts is blatantly sexist. That they “suck” – my apologies for the vulgar language, but I wanted to write this in terms the media might understand – on the grounds of invasion of privacy and irrelevance is perhaps subject matter for future postings, but not this one. This piece is all about me.

Yes, you hear anger in my prose. I’m a male and the father two children. They’re adults now, but they’re still my kids, and not a day goes by that I don’t wonder and worry about them, that I don’t look for excuses to help them, and for them to include me in their lives.

On behalf of my wife, my daughter, my mother and sister, I resent this particular reaction of the media to Sarah Palin’s candidacy. More to the point, I’m personally insulted by the inference that men like myself are somehow less concerned, less involved in all stages of their children’s lives, than their mothers. True, the character of our involvement may be different. Maybe I had to work outside the house for long hours, and often on the road, while my wife worked in-house taking care of them in so many respects that I could only envy. But then that was my loss, my sacrifice, to help raise my children. And when there were significant problems, thankfully nothing so profound as those confronting Sarah Palin and her husband, my wife and I handled them together.

Men, the ones I know anyway, are no less distracted by our children than our counterparts who are working mothers. That many in the media would think otherwise, that they would be so blatantly oblivious or recklessly carefree in their pursuit of Sarah Palin’s personal life without regard to the implications of their questions, has got to make you wonder about the quality of their reporting and intelligence of their analysis. Their bias confirms their lack of professionalism. Their unwillingness or inability to set reasonable, sympathetic, common sense limits on what they’re willing to cover tells us something not so nice about their character and what these news organizations are willing to do for ratings.


Site Meter

Obama/Palin: The Politics of Race Versus Gender

Saturday, August 30, 2008

In her speech in Dayton on Friday, when she was introduced by Senator McCain as his running mate, Governor Palin went out of her way to call upon women voters to help her, on their behalf, be elected Vice President. Now only 44, even if McCain were to serve a full 8 years, she’d only be 52 years old when she runs for President at the head of her own ticket.

“It was rightly noted in Denver this week,” she said, “that Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America. But it turns out the women of America aren’t finished yet, and we can shatter that glass ceiling once and for all.”

Her objective is perfectly clear. Women need to vote for me to quash the notion that there are limits to what women can do, to the authority and power they can command. Running the country isn’t something women can and will do eventually. It’s something they are ready to do now.

It’s a point which begs the question of whether or not she, Sarah Palin personally, would be an effective President. It could be a case of “right time, wrong candidate” which I’ve made in previous postings about Barack Obama’s campaign. It’s not that we’re not ready for a black President. It’s that Barack Obama, personally, is the wrong black candidate for the job.

Here we have Governor Palin encouraging women to vote for her because she is a woman. There may be other reasons, of course, but gender has got to be high on the short list. Hilary Clinton wasn’t quite so direct, but did frequently remind prospective women voters that her nomination and election would be historic. I’m sure they got the point.

Senator Obama’s nomination and election would also be historic, but for different reasons and, I think, to a lesser extent. From slave to President is a long road, the journey down which is a matter of pride for all Americans as an affirmation of our democracy, and of the self-correcting tendencies of a free society. African Americans are, however, a significant, but relatively small minority of our country.

Women, on the other hand, are half. Their having been discriminated against for so long, in the private and public sectors of our economy, is not only also unforgivable, it has been monumentally inefficient. The unfairness of it all notwithstanding, we have deprived the economy (and government) of the full capabilities of half the population. (It’s something pure capitalism would never have done. It had to be personal.) Fortunately, while discrimination against black and female Americans still exists, it is waning fast and quickly becoming a non-issue right before our eyes. Do we owe Barack Obama or Hilary Clinton anything for proving the point? No. They are just the current beneficiaries of changes in our society which were encouraged by activists, well known and obscure, throughout our history, who forced our country to pay attention.

Unfortunately for the Obama campaign, race doesn’t have equal status in politics. He can’t, as easily, stand up and encourage black people to vote for him precisely because he is black. There’s no point, and it could be counterproductive. Black Americans are going to vote for him anyway, as they have already demonstrated in the primaries. No, what he needs to do is dare white people not to vote for him on the grounds of his race. It’s a pitch which may have worked for many of his Rally People, not to mention an adoring media in the early stages of his campaign, but it’s a more subtle, negative argument which is a much harder sell to the electorate at large than the call to arms Governor Palin is making.


Site Meter

Lack of Experience: The Perverse Argument of John McCain Against Barack Obama

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Political analysts everywhere, working on behalf of the Obama campaign and for the media, have been making the point that McCain’s adding Sarah Palin to his ticket robs him of his argument about Barack Obama’s inexperience.

According to some of those pundits, McCain has opted instead to focus on ideology to energize his conservative base, and on broadening the appeal of his campaign to middle and working class voters. Not incidentally, he’s also re-pitched himself as the real candidate for change by bringing in a Washington outsider – in stark contrast to Obama’s choice of Senator Biden, the consummate Washington insider – who (Sarah Palin) just happens to be a woman.

I disagree that John McCain has taken the experience argument off the table. Quite to the contrary, I think he’s upped the ante on precisely that point. Thanks to Sarah Palin, the Obama campaign cannot argue that she is inexperienced without pointing out, at the same time, the lack of experience of their own standard bearer. They’re making McCain’s point for him.

The fact is, in many important respects Governor Palin is actually more experienced than Senator Obama. More to the point, even if she is relatively inexperienced, she’s only running for Vice President. If Senator Obama would like to switch positions with Joe Biden, that is, let Senator Biden run for President and Senator Obama be his running mate, comparisons between Obama and Palin might make more sense. Unfortunately, Barack Obama is the head of his own ticket. He’s running for President. Governor Palin is only running for Vice President.

Look for the Obama campaign to suppress arguments attacking Palin’s inexperience, and to downplay his signature issue of being the agent of change. That leaves him with arguing that McCain is a Bush clone who “doesn’t get it” – and those are now significantly weaker arguments than they were before Sarah Palin – a working class woman and Washington outsider, that’s been a mayor and now governor — was added to the Republican ticket.


Site Meter

“No way. No how. No kidding.”

“…unfortunately neither Senator Clinton nor Harriet Tubman
is running for President.”

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

In deference to Senator Clinton, her actual words in last night’s rousing speech before the Democratic Convention were, “No way. No how. No McCain.” It may have been good political theater, but unfortunately neither Senator Clinton nor Harriet Tubman is running for President.

Nor will political theater pay anyone’s bills or solve our nation’s many other problems. But I get it. The Democrats are psyching themselves up for the victory they want and anticipate in November. Good for them, and good for the Republicans who are up next.

So why do I feel so uninspired, so disappointed? I’ve thought about it, and the answer is that I’ve had it with form over substance, with the audacity of the presumption that I will be impressed, in any meaningful way, by all this hoopla and rhetoric.

On Thursday, Senator Obama is going to make his acceptance speech at the Denver stadium in front of 76,000+ supporters. His objective is to define his campaign as a bona fide movement, the scope of which transcends what any ordinary convention center can adequately accomodate. The arrogance of it all is unbelievable.

Does Senator Obama really think that hearing the roar and chanting of a stadium full of supporters will make his pitch any more substantive, any more convincing, that it will somehow make him better than his resume? Of course he does. He has to. Like all great magic, the trick is in distracting the audience from what’s really going on. This is the new politics, the “Change You Can Believe In” he’s promised.

As President, will Senator Obama be addressing the nation from The Oval Office, or from FedExFied, the new Redskins stadium? I’m just wondering if any of us can afford the price of season tickets.


Site Meter

Hillary Doesn’t Approve

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

No kidding. Hillary Clinton doesn’t approve of the ad the McCain campaign is running featuring her decidedly negative remarks about Senator Obama made when she was running against him for the nomination. She doesn’t approve, but then she doesn’t retract them either.

Her problem is that she was either purposing overstating Senator Obama’s lack of qualifications to be President, a/k/a “lying,” for those of us who don’t like to mince words, when she made those comments, mistaken, or telling the truth. Pick one.

The first choice strips away her integrity as a candidate and renders her endorsements of Senator Obama and criticisms of Senator McCain less than credible. The second choice suggests incompetence on the part of a very savvy, highly intelligent politician. The third, that she was right, is my personal favorite because it’s factually correct and is consistent with one of the core themes of her campaign, and Senator McCain’s as well.

The fact is, Senator Obama isn’t ready to be President. His resume for that position is all about “Career Objectives,” with pathetically little in the “Experience” section. Everyone knows this, that he’s inexperienced, even his most fervent supporters who believe that what the Senator promises so eloquently, the hope that he sells so effectively transcends the disadvantage of his having never tried and delivered on similar promises in the past.

For those supporting Senator Obama’s candidacy, hope trumps proven judgment and effectiveness. It’s a belief based on the notion that never having done something may actually make you better at doing it if only given the chance. It’s a premise that is occasionally true of newcomers who are not constrained by traditional notions of how things are supposed to be done, but does it work for the person we’re hiring to be President of the United States?

Senator Biden has the same problem with respect to his comments about Senator Obama when he (Biden) was running for President.

Will these people say anything to get themselves elected, or to serve their selfish political interests by supporting a candidate they clearly find deficient? (That was rhetorical.)

It may not be politically correct, but I’d prefer the truth: “Senator Obama is not particularly qualified to be President, but I believe an Obama/Democratic Presidency would be better for the country (and me) than another Republican administration. And here are my reasons why…” Wow, that feels so much better.


Site Meter

Obama/Biden: Hiring Experience. Blowing It Big Time

Saturday, August 23, 2008

It should have been Hilary.  That would have been the bold, masterstroke move that would have assured Senator Obama the Presidency.

On behalf of all of us who have been arguing all along that Senator Obama lacked the experience to be President – including the McCain campaign – I’d like to thank the Senator for proving our point for us.  He agrees by virtue of his choice of Joe Biden as his running mate who adds nothing politically to his chances of being elected, but who has the requisite white hair and senatorial credentials that he (Obama) is lacking.

Now all he has to do is convince us, starting with the Rally People who, with the help of an adoring media, gave him the nomination, that a Co-Presidency is what he’s been selling and they had in mind.  Co-Presidency?  Will Senator Biden simply be a close advisor, in which case he didn’t need to be Senator Obama’s running mate, or is Joe Biden to experience – especially when it comes to foreign policy – what Dick Chaney, Karl Rove, et al, have been to President Bush’s brain?

Senator Obama, it’s a little late in the process for you to admit that your resume needs padding.  Better to have waited 8 or 16 years to run when you, personally, were ready to be President.


Site Meter

Finding Dana

Short Fiction for Guests of the WordFeeder
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Printable version… Finding Dana PDF

October 4, 1966.

“Jeff?”

For a moment, sitting there in the twilight of their bedroom, he thought he heard someone calling his name from whatever was playing on the TV that Dana insisted had to be on all night. He turned to look, wondering for the moment at how surreal the flat screen seemed on the wall behind him, like a painting come to life, not at all what he expected. Slowly, he turned back to stare at her face, barely illuminated by the soft light coming from their lamppost through the blinds. It was the middle of the night, 3:48 AM to be precise, according to the glowing numbers on the radio across the bed, on the nightstand next to the side where he’d been sleeping.

He was up, but tired. He never did need much sleep, but lately, now in his early sixties, getting up in the middle of the night had become routine. Sometimes, he’d go downstairs to do the dishes leftover from a late dinner the night before, or write pieces that no one would ever read. Writing was the passion that practical choices and the circumstances of life had denied him, but not so that it made any difference. Finding Dana made whatever he hadn’t accomplished seem unimportant.

He would stay down until he was tired, so his restlessness wouldn’t disturb her, and then go back to lay beside her, tucking his hand under her side to help him fall asleep.

Tonight he sat on the edge of her side of the bed watching her face – ever so slightly older, but then even more beautiful than the evening he’d first seen it. What he saw was as new as it was familiar. If anything could be both at the same time, it was Dana. She was the girl, now woman he’d love to meet, and yet somehow had always known. Forty years together and still he couldn’t take his eyes off her, but instead of love which was obvious, what he felt was sadness and fear. The night seemed like such a waste of time, given how relatively little they had left. What, maybe 20 years if they were lucky, if he could live that long? A long time when you’re twenty, when there’s more after that, but no time at all when there isn’t.

It was a ridiculous…

“Hey, Jeff?” He heard it again, now with the sound of other voices and music in the background.

Whatever it was, he’d ignore it.

…a ridiculous question, the kind only an over-active mind would consider. On one hand, he wanted to go first, to never have to live without her. On the other… On the other, he loved her too much not to be there for her until the end.

“Hey, buddy,” his friend, Howie, was standing next to the booth Jeff had been holding for them, seeming unusually short, an anxious waiter holding a tray over her head while his friends blocked the narrow aisle. Pushing on Jeff’s shoulder, he tried again, “Jeffrey, honey? I really need you to…”

“Yeh. Hi. Hi. ..Sorry, I was just… Actually, I’m not sure what I was thinking about.” Looking up, his eyes blew past his chubby friend, past “Bunny,” the girl he’d been dating, to her friend with the green eyes, short blond hair and instantly familiar smile.

He stood up carefully, worried he’d forget that the booths were one step up. He’d made a mental note not to make a fool of himself when he first got there and asked the girl at the door if he could hold the table for his friends. “The Pub,” which was all the simple sign over the door said, was one of those places every college town has, right off campus, where bad cheeseburgers on Kaiser rolls and fat steak fries couldn’t have tasted better.

“Hi,” he smiled back at her, extending his hand. It was too proper, close to weird, he knew that, but he had to be sure. “I’m Jeff,” he told her, as if she didn’t already know.

“Jeff,” Howie decided he needed to make a formal introduction. “This is Dana. Dana, this is Jeff.” For some reason it made her giggle.

He was still holding her hand, but finally let go on the way to inviting her to sit next to him on his side of the booth. Howie and Bunny squeezed in across from them. The table, he thought, was too wide, too far across for them to talk.

Turning to his left to face her, while Howie passed out their badly typed menus in plastic folders, he said it again. “Hi.”

“You already said that,” she answered, leaving him to wonder if she punctuated every sentence with that same smile.

“Yeh, uhhh… We need to go out.”

“We are out.”

“I mean on a date?”

“This isn’t a date?”

“I meant, without Howie, Bunny, or any other animals.”

“Don’t you want to see how tonight goes?” she asked, knowing already how it was going to turn out.

“No, no. I mean, I already know we’re going out again.”

“You do?”

“ I just wanted to get the award moment after I walk you back to the dorm out of the way now… so I can spend more time kissing you goodnight.”

Suddenly, Howie and “The Rabbit” as he sometimes referred to her in private, stopped over-talking each other and were staring across the table, their eyes moving from one of their friends to the other.

Pausing for a moment, Dana leaned forward, planting a gentle, perfectly long-lasting kiss on his lips, a little bubble popping as she broke away. It felt like a week before he opened his eyes, but she waited before saying anything. “There. Now that that’s out of the way, maybe you can buy me something to eat.”

-wf

What to read more? Just click here and pick a title you like.

Copyright as of the title date or earlier, by me.
(I write the WordFeeder blog.)  All rights reserved.
Email WordFeeder@verizon.net for additional information.

“Or what?”

“The power of moral suasion is minimal.  Talk is cheap, and everyone knows it.”
Saturday, August 16, 2008

President Bush is fond of telling other countries – Russia, for example, in the context of its invasion of Georgia sovereign territory – that they should or shouldn’t do this or that, often intimating that he is personally offended by their behavior.

In deference to President Bush who is a particularly poor speaker, his counterparts through history and contemporaries in other countries may be more eloquent, but no more effective.  The simple rule, if you’ll pardon the dangling preposition, is that countries will do what they can away with.  The power of moral suasion is minimal.  Talk is cheap, and everyone knows it.

Who cares what President Bush, or we or world opinion thinks?  Does anyone believe for a second that Prime Minister Putin gives a you-know-what about how we react, that he can’t anticipate our rhetoric, and doesn’t discount the effect of our shock and alarm to zero?

Consider the following excerpts from President Bush’s comments on the subject which he delivered Wednesday, August 13, 2008…

Continue reading