Tag Archives: News

Healthcare Legislation Interview of the Day: “This ‘beat the clock’ is really overruling legislative sanity.”

Monday, December 21, 2009

That headline quote is from Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine from her appearance yesterday on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” You’ll have to skip by the commercial which I couldn’t edit out, but it’s worth watching. If you prefer, I’ve included a similar print version of her remarks from the Senator’s website.

“Legislative sanity” is exactly what this is about. The President and most Democrats in the Senate and House are proceeding to pass healthcare legislation according to arbitrary deadlines in reckless disregard for due process and for the quality and costs of they are accomplishing. It’s nuts and, to be blunt, they deserve to be thrown out of office the very first chance the American people get, President Obama included.

Senator Snowe is no obstructionist, no partisan Republican hell bent on denying the President and Democrats a political victory. She is, quite to the contrary, a very intelligent, experienced state and federal legislator who is committed to meaningful, affordable healthcare reform. If you remember, Senator Snowe was the only Republican to vote for an earlier version of the Senate’s bill when it came to a vote on the Senate Finance Committee. What she is, is a voice of clarity in a democratic process overwhelmed by the worst kind of politics. I encourage you to listen to her brief interview or read her comments, and to judge their value for yourselves.

-wf


Site Meter

Healthcare Legislation: Two’s family, three should be illegal.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The American people – you and me – are struggling to change the way they buy medical services. It’s about nothing less than the quality of our lives and how long we live. We’re doing this through our elected representatives in the House, the Senate and the Oval Office. The inexperienced and naïve “phenom” we elected President has mismanaged the legislative process. A superfluous Senate, vestigial remnant of the origins of our democracy, has re-affirmed its uselessness. And the House… Well, the House is what it is, way too many people (495) treading water between elections.

What can we do but sigh, remind ourselves that, in the world of our politics, they – the President, Senate and House – are “family,” let them do their thing and hope for the best. They are, after all, us.
Continue…

Healthcare Legislation: Blowing Off 15 Million Americans

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

“In the beginning…” Sounds biblical, doesn’t it? In the beginning, going way back to January 20 of this year, the day Barack Obama took office, there were two reasons for healthcare reform legislation. They were, in no particular order: (1) Because the costs of healthcare are spiraling out of control; and (2) Because there are an estimated 46 million Americans who have no medical insurance at all and who, because they can’t afford it, are not receiving adequate healthcare. This piece is about the second of these reasons, the need for universal healthcare, for a system, a program that would ensure that all Americans would have access to the quality healthcare they need.

To his credit, President Obama wasted no time telling Congress to get its collective ass in gear to devise and pass healthcare reform legislation of, once again, biblical proportions. Easier said than done.
Continue…

Healthcare Reform: Preoccupation with the grandiose at the expense of the American people

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

All this time Congress and the President have been arguing about healthcare reform in a desperate attempt to make history in one sweeping piece of legislation, the details and costs of which not even they fully understand, think of what they could have accomplished without it costing us a dime.

1. Pass a law – a relatively simple, standalone piece legislation – preventing any medical insurance company from charging individual applicants more for coverage than what they charge groups of only 2 or more.
Continue…

The Supply Side Economics of President Obama

Monday, December 14, 2009

President Obama is hell bent on helping the small businesses of America. “Better late than never,” some would say, but they would be wrong.

His idea is simple. Too simple. Make more money available to small business by leaning on our banks to make loans they really would prefer not to, and give those small business tax incentives to hire more people… Wait a minute. Just stop for a second. Why would any business, particularly a small, scared business with limited resources, a tiny drop in the ocean which is the American economy, expand its operations without knowing it can sell the additional goods or services it produces? …I’m waiting. …”On spec?” you say timidly. Hey! Who said that?! Maybe in a strong, surging economy, but not in the midst of the most serious economic downturn since the Great Depression. No way.
Continue…

Waiting for Elin

Sunday, December 13, 2009

For the past couple of weeks since word of Tiger Woods’ serial infidelity made it to the news, I’ve been wondering: Am I the only married man who doesn’t get Elin Nordegren Woods?

She’s certainly beautiful, and I mean that in an “Oh my God!” kind of way, but my wife is beautiful too. (I say that because it’s true, and in case she’s reading this.) If it were me, if I were the one who had been unfaithful – once, twice, 11 times and counting – I can’t imagine the rage, the hurt that she would be feeling. Maybe that’s what’s going on here, in the head and heart of Mrs. Woods, and we’re just not seeing it because it’s none of our business, and because the Woods have the good taste, common sense and money to keep the media at a distance.

True, it really is none of my business, but then I’m not the one who so flagrantly disrespected his marriage. I’m not the one making, or the media producing the headlines. For me, it’s like a movie. None of these people are real.

For one thing, by all accounts Tiger Woods is a billionaire. If Elin walks, she gets 30% of his wealth according to the rumored terms of their prenuptial agreement – and leaves with her pride intact. Who would blame her? In fact, the real question is, “Why would she stay?”

Well, for one thing, they have 2 very young children. Keeping it together for them would be perfectly understandable. Love, for each other, would be another good reason. There’s the potential to make even more money from continuing, renewed and even new endorsements when he returns to tournament golf with got-to-be spectacular ratings. (Maybe Church & Dwight, the makers of Trojan brand condoms, might be interested.)

And then there’s the argument that he’s guilty by reason of mental defect. To quote the great Robert Palmer, he’s “addicted to love.” Sexual additions are real, I guess. I’m no psychologist, but the plea suggests that, if you’re going to be unfaithful once, better to do it all over the place, as openly as possible including lots of text mail, so you can claim to be sick instead of just a jerk.

Tiger Woods, according to media reports, responds to all this by offering Elin money. I’ve read $5 million immediately, then much more over the next few years if she stays with him, and maybe an increase in the 30% limit in their pre-nup. Of all the things I’ve heard about Mr. Woods, this is the one that disturbs me most – if it’s true.

Are the 11 alleged instances of infidelity troublesome? Absolutely. Does every red-blooded male look at Elin Nordegren and wonder what Tiger was thinking? Yeah. (Sorry, ladies, it’s a hormonal thing.) And then there’s the text mail which begs the question, “Is stupidity grounds for divorce?” But to offer his wife money to stay with him, to trivialize marriage and parenthood by making them nothing more than a continuing financial transaction, is unforgiveable – again, if any of it is true.

I understand that Tiger Woods is a business, and why some sponsors will stay with him, and others won’t because of what his predicament means for their bottom lines. I, on the other hand, am not a business. That he would offer Elin money is reprehensible. That she would not be insulted and appalled by that offer is something I just can’t fathom. It’s so not in the character of my wife, my mother, my daughter or any of the good women I know and respect.

Shame on you, Tiger. As for Elin, the jury is still out.

-wf


Site Meter

16.5%

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Yesterday, Annise Parker was elected to be Mayor of Houston. Congratulations to Mayor-Elect Parker. I’ve attached the article from the on-line edition of the Houston Chronicle if you’d like details about the election. It’s interesting reading.

The headlines last night and this morning will make a big deal about Ms. Parker being openly gay. What may not get as much attention is that only 16.5% of Houston’s 941,000 registered voters showed up for the run-off election, only 18.4% in November when 4 candidates were running.* Ms. Parker won 52.8% (81,971) of yesterday’s votes.

I don’t mean to diminish her victory in any way, except to state the obvious. 83.5% of registered voters didn’t make it to the polls. No doubt the people of Houston are preoccupied by other, more important problems which only our federal government can address, the profound nature of which may make city government seem petty and irrelevant. Whatever their specific reasons, the vast majority of the Houston electorate clearly didn’t care who got elected.

Only 8.7% of registered voters cast their votes for Ms. Parker – even less of the total eligible to vote, including those who didn’t register. She’ll govern, and probably govern well given her history. Unfortunately, as long as she doesn’t make any serious mistakes, no one will care, no one will be paying attention.

-wf

*Total votes cast in this 2 person run-off election were 155,302 which is 16.5% of 941,224 registered voters. Total votes cast for Mayor in the November 3 election were 173,151 which is 18.4% of registered voters.


Site Meter

“Free Bernie Madoff!”

Friday, December 11, 2009

Actually, it never made sense to put him in prison in the first place.

As I see it, the only good reason to put someone in prison is self defense, to prevent him (or her) from doing bad things to one of us. To imprison someone as punishment or revenge for bad things done, but not to be repeated, is immature and spiteful. It’s a waste of time and money that could be better invested.

I didn’t lose anything to Bernie Madoff, but, if I had, the last thing I’d want to do with someone with his particular skill set would be locking him up where the best he can do is work for the prison laundry or cafeteria for pennies an hour. No way.

If he stole money from me, I’d want him out of prison, with one of those ankle bracelets we use nowadays to monitor criminals on work-release programs, sitting in front of a computer, in a trading room or wherever he needs to be, earning as much money as he can – but legitimately this time. His incentive? Limited mobility and income as a percent of what he pays to his victims. If it was me he screwed, I’d want him working night and day to pay me back.

And if he fails to meet certain reasonable objectives, if he’s less than busy with the task of making restitution, or if his behavior is insufficiently contrite or otherwise inappropriate, then we can always send him back to jail, can’t we?

So let’s let Bernie go. Let’s save taxpayers the cost of keeping him in jail. Let’s be smart and put him to work for the people whose wealth and lives he stole. Many of them are having to work to replace what he took, why shouldn’t he? To waste all that experience and expertise, to effectively steal those potential earnings from his victims by keeping Bernie Madoff in prison is nothing short of… well, criminal.

-wf


Site Meter

The Bass Ackwards Economics of Bailout II

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Ours is a consumer-driven economy. Everyone knows this, including our government, which is why it keeps extending unemployment benefits. Do everything you can to keep people spending, even while they’re unemployed and looking for work. It is the most, and possibly the only really effective thing the Obama Administration and Congress have done to prevent an already horrendous recession from being even worse.

The same logic should apply to the design of any bailout. If you want to generate jobs in a hurry, give every dollar you (the government) can spend to the people who need it most, whose propensity to spend it is the highest, preferably 100%. What you shouldn’t do is give it to business, large or small, hoping they will use the money to hire more people. That doesn’t work. Particularly during a recession, companies are reluctant to hire people unless they have a proven market for whatever product or service they sell. As for public works projects, they take forever and don’t hire nearly enough, fast enough – directly or indirectly – to lead a recovery. (Funding public works projects in a recession is all about politics, and is not good economic policy.)
Continue…

$2.03 Trillion: How much are we willing to pay because some Americans need to smoke?

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

If ever there was a no brainer, this is it. The only thing missing are the Congressional and Presidential balls to do it. The ill-health that smoking causes costs this country a fortune. According to the CDC (“Smoking and Tobacco Use” from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), smoking costs the United States – you and me — $97 BILLION PER YEAR in lost productivity, plus $96 BILLION PER YEAR in avoidable healthcare expenses — plus another $10 billion per year associated with secondhand smoke. For those of you too stunned to do basic math, that’s a total of $203 BILLION PER YEAR.

The President and Congress like to talk about healthcare reform in terms of a 10 year period. Okay, $203 billion per year, times 10, is $2.03 TRILLION. (My apologies for the excessive use of capitalization, but I’m frustrated about this beyond belief.)

It’s time the American people, on behalf of those of our countrymen and women who can’t help but smoke, for reasons of fiscal responsibility, and to better enable us to afford healthcare reform for all of us… It’s time we demand that Congress make the sale and consumption of cigarettes illegal – as illegal as any narcotic or other controlled substance that threatens the health of its constituents.

Would some of you please e-mail, call or write your Representative, Senator and President Obama and tell them that no healthcare reform legislation is acceptable unless it includes a national, comprehensive ban on smoking and on the sale of tobacco for that purpose? If you’re too busy, just e-mail them the link to this posting or, if you like, leave a comment, including the state where you live, and I’ll do my best to get it to them for you.

Thank you.

-wf

For additional reading… “Making Cigarettes Illegal” posted on the Wordfeeder, August 30, 2009.


Site Meter