Negative Advertising: An essential means of voter education.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Hi. This is the first of two articles that I’m writing about “negative advertising,” a concept that I believe has been given a bad rap by the media and, most importantly, by the form of it that many well-funded candidates and their political action committees have chosen. This first piece is about its definition and essential role. (As usual, I’m going to write like I know what I’m talking about, leaving it to your comments to help me get it right.)

“Negative advertising” is when one candidate or organization supporting a candidate runs ads that point out shortcomings of the other candidate. The media treats negative advertising like it’s a bad thing. It’s not.
Continue…

Barack Obama v. Mitt Romney: Comparing resumes.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

It’s only fair. President Obama wants us to focus on Mitt Romney’s history at Bain Capital, and the media is on that like white on rice – an expression which made more sense before my wife told me that brown rice is better for you, no political metaphor intended.

While the media and Newark’s Cory Booker are busy wondering whether it’s fair to criticize capitalism, I’d like to take a different tack. I’d like to compare candidate Romney’s resume to President Obama’s prior to his running for President. (We all know what he’s done since then.) If he’s asking us to consider Mitt Romney’s preparedness to be President, we have every right to ask the same question about President Obama.
Continue…

www.NextContestant.us

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Hi. In recent months, and the past few weeks in particular, I’ve been been writing political pieces about our need to replace non-performing incumbents. Reaction to these posts has been unexpectedly strong, so encouraging, in fact, that I’ve started a new blog, www.NextContestant.us, where I will be posting related materials going forward.

Today, for example, I’ve just posted 8. Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “If our democracy were a business…”

If you’re interested, please go there, to www.NextContestant.us, when you have time. Read the “About” page, look around, and feel free to leave your comments and suggestions.

Thanks.

Update, Monday, May 21:
And I’ve just posted 9. Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “Money buys you access.” It’s about Senator Cardin’s membership on the Senate Committee on Finance’s Subcommittee on Health Care and campaign contributions he’s received from health industry-related PACs.

-wf

Same-sex marriage: 65.62% of NC registered voters didn’t even care enough to show up.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Sadly, we have become a nation of smaller, less important issues. It’s a sign of impotence, of weakness, of a lack of leadership that should be realized within all of us individually and in our elected officials on our collective behalf. We can’t fix the big things, so we spend our time dancing around important, but lesser matters which, historically, will turn out to have been far less profound than we led ourselves to believe at the time. And in the meantime, the big problems we are neglecting are becoming increasingly severe.

Yesterday, President Obama came out in favor of same-sex marriage. Good for him. (If you sensed sarcasm, you’re a good reader.) It is, without question, a controversial concept that is very important, certainly to the gay and lesbian community, but also to some heterosexuals.

“Wait a minute, buster,” I can hear you asking. (Who calls anyone “buster” anymore?) “..Some heterosexuals? Some?! What about Tuesday’s primary in North Carolina where a constitutional amendment ‘to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State’ passed overwhelmingly, 61% in favor, 39% opposed?? What about that?!”

You know, you’re absolutely right. According to the North Carolina Board of Elections, a whopping 1,303,876 votes were cast for the amendment, 832,219 votes against it. It’s impressive, until you realize that only 34.38% of North Carolina’s 6,296,759 registered voters even bothered, even cared enough about the issue of same-sex marriage to show up. This is one time the other two-thirds of the North Carolina electorate, when the “No Shows” got it right. For these two-thirds, the issue of same-sex marriage wasn’t, an “issue” that is.

In the words of Paul Simon, the great singer-songwriter, “Orangutans are skeptical of changes in their cages.” Well, we all – orangutans included – need to get over it. Homosexuality is real, enduring and entirely benign. We need to stop quibbling and be more respectful, tolerant and appreciative of the differences among us. “Marriage” is only a word. Gays and lesbians, on the other hand, are people.
Continue…

Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “Senator Cardin’s Brain.”

Monday, May 7, 2012

In the past couple of weeks, I’ve written six articles having to do with the race between the one-term U.S. Senator from Maryland, Democrat Ben Cardin, and his challenger, newcomer Republican Dan Bongino. Both candidates are good, smart, competent, reasonable men. All things equal, making a decision between the two of them would be a toss-up. But all things are anything but.

Between the two candidates, the choice is simple. One of them, incumbent Senator Cardin has done nothing to warrant his reelection. The old adage still applies. If you’re not part of the solution, well then, you’re part of the problem. We need to give his opponent, Dan Bongino, an opportunity to do better.
Continue…

Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “Rubber stamp.”

Saturday, May 5, 2012

This is the sixth article I’ve written recently about the race between Maryland’s first-term U.S. Senator Ben Cardin who is running for reelection against Republic newcomer Dan Bongino. If you’re interested, all the articles in this series begin like this one, with “Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino.”

Senator Cardin’s Brain

It’s hard sometimes, when you’re writing a political piece, not to sound flip, but I’ll do my best. While I’ve been critical of Senator Cardin, it’s not because he’s not a good, smart, honest, hard-working man. I’m serious. I believe him to be all those things. My problem with his candidacy is that he’s done nothing in the past five plus years to warrant his reelection. By all indications, he’s done nothing to address, let alone actually help resolve, the major economic, fiscal and social problems our country is facing. Given the critical nature of these matters, it’s not enough to just show up.
Continue…

Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “Ben’s Priority Legislation.”

Friday, May 4, 2012

Hi. In four previous articles, the ones with titles beginning with “Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino,” I’ve been making the point that Maryland’s incumbent U.S. Senator, Ben Cardin, who is running against political newcomer Dan Bongino, has failed to perform at a level that warrants his reelection. While Senator Cardin is a good, competent man, his long-term lack of productivity and failure to address our country’s highest priority problems are compelling reasons to vote him out, and Mr. Bongino in.

So, what exactly are these “highest priority problems” to which I keep referring? Are you kidding? Here’s my short list of what I think Congress should be working on like they were the second coming of the Manhattan Project, without the bomb part of course:
Continue…

Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “How has Senator Cardin been financing his campaign?”

Thursday, May 3, 2012

I’m just a guy, a citizen with a notebook computer who works stupid hours and whose only real hobby is writing. (It’s easy, because I don’t have to get up from my desk and there’s no glue involved. I don’t like glue.) This is my fourth piece on the race between Maryland’s U.S. Senate incumbent, Democrat Ben Cardin, and his opponent, Republican Dan Bongino. If you’re interested, all three previous articles begin with the same “Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino” that you see in the title above.

Most of us like to root for the underdog, which probably says something about how we view ourselves, how we want to believe the little guy can come from behind, snatching victory from the jaws of seemingly invincible defeat. Unfortunately, in the politics of our time, it’s really hard for the spunky newcomer, without any real money in his campaign, to beat a well-heeled incumbent.
Continue…

Why Congress never gets anything done.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Hi. Ever wonder why Congress never gets anything done, never gets around to solving the really big problems? Well, my muse.. Yes, I have a muse. (What? You don’t?) As you can imagine, she’s very important to me, this particular muse. So I married her, lest she get away and a-muse someone else.

“So what do you think is wrong with Congress, honey?” I asked her recently, expecting a lengthy, intellectually sophisticated response worthy of her considerable intelligence.

“I think they’re all a bunch of yahoos,” she responded, without hesitation, cutting to the quick as muses sometimes do. Needless to say, it’s a belief she shares in common with many Americans.
Continue…

Ben Cardin v. Dan Bongino: “What exactly has Senator Cardin been doing all this time?”

Monday, April 30, 2012

Hi. This is my third in a series of posts I’ve been writing about Ben Cardin, one-term Democrat incumbent U.S. Senator from Maryland, who is running for reelection against Republican Dan Bongino, who has never held elective office. Links to the other two articles are at the bottom of this piece. Both candidates are good, honest, hardworking, competent people. That said, I’ve decided to vote for Mr. Bongino, the challenger, based on the failure of the incumbent, Mr. Cardin, to address the major problems we are facing with the focus, “all-in” enthusiasm, aggressiveness and effectiveness the timely resolution of these problems demands.

No question about it, there are political differences between Mr. Cardin and Mr. Bongino on meaningful, important issues. In fact, I don’t agree with everything either candidate believes, but I’m not going to let that bother me. In ordinary times, I would, but not now. I have a short list of really, really critical matters on which I want my Senator’s attention riveted until they’re resolved. Mr. Cardin has been Senator for the last five years, four months, and a Congressman for twenty years before that. Unfortunately, his efforts on my country’s and my family’s behalf have fallen short, way short, of what our national situation requires.
Continue…